How To Use AMP Tools and Reports In Google Search Console Easily


In this google search console tutorial, we help you How To Use AMP Tools and Reports In Google Search Console Easily.





AMP Tools And Reports In Google Search Console





This AMP Status Report In Google Search Console helps you fix errors that prevent your AMP pages from appearing in Google Search results with AMP-specific features.





The top level view shows all AMP pages with issues found by Google on your site, grouped by issue. Click a specific issue to see issue details, including a sample list of pages affected by that issue, information about how to fix it, and a process to notify Google about your fixes.





To see charts showing the effect of issues and fixes, visit the Status page. Why is this a sample list? We show as many pages affected by errors as we can. However, we have a hard limit of 1,000 URLs that we can show in our table. Also, it's possible that there are additional pages that we didn't detect or count for some reason.





OPEN AMP REPORT






https://youtu.be/n2mrpZLTtug








What to look for





Ideally you should see this on the report:





  • Zero AMP errors on your site (warnings are considered recommendations, not errors; see Understanding warnings below). If not, see Prioritize and fix issues.
  • The total count of AMP pages on the report (valid + warning + error pages) should be close to the number of AMP pages on your site. If not, see Missing AMP pages.




What others are reading:









List of AMP issues





In addition to standard AMP-specific errors, the report can expose the following additional issues (errors and warnings).





Google-specific AMP issues





IssueDescription
Content mismatch: Missing embedded videoThe canonical web page has an embedded video that is missing in the AMP version. It is usually best to include all the same important content resources in your AMP version as in the canonical web page. Note that the video is detected by URL; if you have two different URLs pointing to the same video, you will see this warning.
Image size smaller than recommended sizeThe structured data in the AMP refers to an image that is smaller than our recommended size. This may prevent the page from appearing with all AMP-related features on Google Search, and may also prevent your Discover cards from appearing with large images (leading to decreased website traffic and user engagement). To fix, use a larger image according to our guidelines.
AMP page domain mismatchThe AMP page is hosted on a different domain than its canonical version. This can be confusing to mobile searchers who see one URL domain in search results and a different one when they open the page in the AMP reader. (Does not affect page indexing or ranking.)
URL not found (404)The AMP URL requested could not be found. Learn about fixing 404 pages.
Server error (5XX)Unspecified 5XX server error when requesting the AMP page. Learn more about server errors.
Blocked by robots.txtThe requested AMP URL was blocked by a robots.txt rule.
Crawl issueUnspecified crawling error for the AMP page. Use the URL Inspection tool on your AMP URL to troubleshoot the problem. 
Referenced AMP URL is not an AMPA canonical page references an AMP that is not, in fact, an AMP page. Learn how a non-AMP page should reference an AMP page.
Referenced AMP URL is self-canonical AMPThe canonical page points to a stand-alone AMP. You cannot reference a stand-alone AMP as the AMP version of a page. Learn how to reference an AMP from a non-AMP page.
URL marked 'noindex'AMP is blocked by a 'noindex' directive. Google cannot index a page that is blocked by noindex; either remove the noindex directive, or remove the reference to the blocked page.
'unavailable_after' date for this page has expiredAMP page has an "unavailable_after" meta tag or directive that has already passed, indicating that it should no longer be served. You should either update the tag to a future date, or remove the tag.
Canonical points to invalid URLA canonical page references an AMP version using an invalidly formatted URL. Learn how to properly reference an AMP version.
amp-story canonical errorA page incorrectly references an amp-story page as its AMP version. This is not allowed because an amp-story page is, by definition, self-canonical: it must point to itself with a <rel="canonical"> tag, and cannot serve as an AMP version of another page.




Signed Exchange Issues IN AMP





Both the AMP status report and the URL inspection report can show issues for AMPs that use the signed exchange protocol.





To see signed exchange details about an issue





You can find information about the signed exchange associated with an AMP in multiple places:





  • In the URL Inspection tool, click the issue under AMP version details.
  • In the AMP Status report, click a URL in the issue details table.




To see if your AMP uses signed exchange





To see whether or not Google has detected any signed exchange headers or payloads for your AMP:





  1. Inspect the AMP URL (either uses the URL Inspection tool to inspect a specific URL or in the AMP Status report, click the inspect icon next to the URL in the issue details table).
  2. Click View crawled page in the results page to open a side panel containing more information.
  3. Click the More Info tab.
  4. Below the Signed exchange label you will see a status that indicates whether Google detected any signed exchange components for that AMP.




List of signed exchange issues





The following issues can occur when your AMP uses the signed exchange protocol.





  • The signed exchange is invalid
  • The signed exchange payload has a parse error
  • The header 'header_name' for the signed exchange payload has an invalid value
  • The mandatory header 'header_name' for the signed exchange payload is missing
  • The signature header for the signed exchange cannot be parsed
  • The parameter 'parameter_name' in the signed exchange signature header is invalid
  • The dates for the signed exchange are invalid
  • The certificate chain referenced by the signed exchange 'cert-url' cannot be parsed
  • The certificate chain referenced by 'cert-url' is invalid for the signed exchange
  • The signed exchange cannot be parsed
  • The URL for the inner payload does not match the request URL for the signed exchange
  • The header 'header_name' for the signed exchange HTTP response has an invalid value




The signed exchange is invalid





The HTTP response was a signed exchange that did not meet the Google AMP Cache requirements. As a result, the page will be presented to users without any information from the signature.





Impact to your site:





The page will be presented in an AMP viewer with a Google URL, rather than its original URL.





Next steps:





Addressing this error is optional; pages with this error will still display properly inside an AMP viewer. If you wish for this page to be presented with its signed URL, then continue reading.





This error could occur for several reasons, including:









If you are using a signed exchange service provider, consult them for assistance.





If you are using AMP Packager:





  • Verify that you are running the latest release of AMP Packager.
  • If so, please file a bug.




The signed exchange payload has a parse error





The HTTP response was a signed exchange whose “payload” (body) did not meet the Google AMP Cache requirements. As a result, the page will be presented to users without any information from the signature.





Impact to your site:





The page will be presented in an AMP viewer with a Google URL, rather than its original URL.





Next steps:





Addressing this error is optional; pages with this error will still display properly inside an AMP viewer. If you wish for this page to be presented with its signed URL, then continue reading.





Try the following steps to find and fix the error:





  • Verify that the HTML does not contain an invalid UTF-8 encoding. For the erroring, run, and check for any error messages such as “illegal input sequence”. If it does, please ensure the document is properly UTF-8 encoded. Two common sources of multibyte characters are non-English text and spaces.
  • Verify that the HTML does not contain a U+0000 NULL or a Unicode character that causes an HTML parse error.
  • Verify that the HTML is unchanged after calling transform -config NONE. There are two common reasons for it to change:
  • It was serialized using a printer other than the one bundled with AMP Packager. If you are using another signed exchange generator, ensure that it is using AMP Packager’s transformer library.
  • The HTML causes a parse error that is handled by modifying the parse tree. Often, these are caused by omitted or misplaced end tags. Examples of this include the adoption agency algorithm and “form” end tag handling. Diagnosing these errors is difficult; an HTML markup validator may help find the cause.
  • If you have ruled out all of the above:
  • If you are using a signed exchange service provider, consult them for assistance.
  • If you are using AMP Packager:
  • Verify that you are running the latest release of AMP Packager.
  • If so, there may be a bug in AMP Packager; please file a bug.




The header 'header_name' for the signed exchange payload has an invalid value





The HTTP response was a signed exchange that contained a signed response header that didn’t meet one of the Google AMP Cache requirements. As a result, the page will be presented to users without any information from the signature.





Impact to your site:





The page will be presented in an AMP viewer with a Google URL, rather than its original URL.





Next steps:





Addressing this error is optional; pages with this error will still display properly inside an AMP viewer. If you wish for this page to be presented with its signed URL, then continue reading.





If you are using a signed exchange service provider, consult them for assistance.





If you are using AMP Packager:





  • Verify that you are running the latest release of AMP Packager.
  • If so, please file a bug.




The mandatory header 'header_name' for the signed exchange payload is missing





The HTTP response was a signed exchange that was missing the given header, required either by the signed exchanges specification or the Google AMP Cache requirements. As a result, the page will be presented to users without any information from the signature.





Impact to your site:





The page will be presented in an AMP viewer with a Google URL, rather than its original URL.





Next steps:





Addressing this error is optional; pages with this error will still display properly inside an AMP viewer. If you wish for this page to be presented with its signed URL, then continue reading.





If you are using a signed exchange service provider, consult them for assistance.





If you are using AMP Packager:





  • Verify that you are running the latest release of AMP Packager.
  • If so, please file a bug.




The signature header for the signed exchange cannot be parsed





The HTTP response was a signed exchange that contained a signature header that was not well-formed according to the signed exchanges specification. As a result, the page will be presented to users without any information from the signature.





Impact to your site:





The page will be presented in an AMP viewer with a Google URL, rather than its original URL.





Next steps:





Addressing this error is optional; pages with this error will still display properly inside an AMP viewer. If you wish for this page to be presented with its signed URL, then continue reading.





If you are using a signed exchange service provider, consult them for assistance.





If you are using AMP Packager:





  • Verify that you are running the latest release of AMP Packager.
  • If so, please file a bug.




The parameter 'parameter_name' in the signed exchange signature header is invalid





The HTTP response was a signed exchange whose signature header had an incorrect value for the given parameter, as required by the signed exchanges specification. As a result, the page will be presented to users without any information from the signature.





Impact to your site:





The page will be presented in an AMP viewer with a Google URL, rather than its original URL.





Next steps:





Addressing this error is optional; pages with this error will still display properly inside an AMP viewer. If you wish for this page to be presented with its signed URL, then continue reading.





If you are using a signed exchange service provider, consult them for assistance.





If you are using AMP Packager:





  • Verify that you are running the latest release of AMP Packager.
  • If so, please file a bug.




The dates for the signed exchange are invalid





The HTTP response was a signed exchange whose signature header had an incorrect value for the date or expires parameter, as required by the signed exchanges specification or the Google AMP Cache requirements. (In particular, the signature must be valid at the time it is fetched, and at least 4 days in the future.) As a result, the page will be presented to users without any information from the signature





Impact to your site:





The page will be presented in an AMP viewer with a Google URL, rather than its original URL.





Next steps:





Addressing this error is optional; pages with this error will still display properly inside an AMP viewer. If you wish for this page to be presented with its signed URL, then continue reading.





If you are using a signed exchange service provider, consult them for assistance.





If you are using AMP Packager, this could happen for several reasons:





  • Verify that your front-end reverse-proxy is not caching signed exchange responses for too long. Make multiple requests for the page with curl -H 'Accept: application/signed-exchange;v=b3' -H 'AMP-Cache-Transform: any' and search for "date=" in each response; verify that the subsequent number is different each time.
  • Verify that you are running the latest release of AMP Packager.
  • If you have ruled out all of the above, there may be a bug in AMP Packager; please file a bug.




The certificate chain referenced by the signed exchange 'cert-url' cannot be parsed





The HTTP response was a signed exchange whose cert-url was not well-formed per the signed exchanges specification. As a result, the page will be presented to users without any information from the signature.





Impact to your site:





The page will be presented in an AMP viewer with a Google URL, rather than its original URL.





Next steps:





Addressing this error is optional; pages with this error will still display properly inside an AMP viewer. If you wish for this page to be presented with its signed URL, then continue reading.





If you are using a signed exchange service provider, consult them for assistance.





If you are using AMP Packager:





  • Verify that you are running the latest release of AMP Packager.
  • If so, please file a bug.




The certificate chain referenced by 'cert-url' is invalid for the signed exchange





The HTTP response was a signed exchange whose cert-url was invalid according to the signed exchanges specification. As a result, the page will be presented to users without any information from the signature.





Impact to your site:





The page will be presented in an AMP viewer with a Google URL, rather than its original URL.





Next steps:





Addressing this error is optional; pages with this error will still display properly inside an AMP viewer. If you wish for this page to be presented with its signed URL, then continue reading.





If you are using a signed exchange service provider, consult them for assistance.





If you are using AMP Packager, this error could occur for several reasons. Some things to check:





  • Verify that your CertFile does not contain a full list of the leaf certificate plus intermediates.
  • Verify that AMP Packager was not launched with the -development or -invalidcert flag. In production mode, AMP Packager will verify several aspects of the certificate.
  • Verify that your frontend reverse-proxy is not caching /amppkg/cert/ URLs for longer than is set by their max-age.
  • Verify that your frontend reverse-proxy is not modifying cache headers; this could cause an upstream proxy to cache these certificate chains for too long. To test, determine the corresponding /amppkg/cert/ URL on your internal packager domain, fetch it including response headers (for instance, with curl -i), and compare the response headers to those returned by the frontend server.
  • Verify that your certificate contains an SCT, for instance using the openssl x509 tool. If it does not, please consult your certificate authority.
  • Verify that you are running the latest release of AMP Packager.
  • If you have ruled out all of the above, there may be a bug in AMP Packager; please file a bug.




The signed exchange cannot be parsed





The HTTP response had a content-type of application/signed-exchange;v=b3, but the response body could not be extracted. This could be because it failed to meet the high-level requirements of that type, or because its payload was improperly Merkle-encoded.





Impact to your site:





If the page has a corresponding non-AMP page, Google Search will index that instead. Otherwise, the page might not appear in Google Search at all.





Next steps:





If you are using a signed exchange service provider, consult them for assistance.





If you are using AMP Packager, this could happen for several reasons:





  • Verify that your front-end reverse-proxy is not altering the responses from the packager. For the erroring URL, determine the corresponding /priv/doc URL on your internal packager domain, and test it using dump-signedexchange. If the internal packager response is a valid signed exchange but the external front-end response is not, then there is likely a configuration error in the front end.
  • Verify that you are running the latest release of AMP Packager.
  • If you have ruled out all of the above, there may be a bug in AMP Packager; please file a bug.




The URL for the inner payload does not match the request URL for the signed exchange





The HTTP response was a signed exchange whose fallbackUrl did not match the request URL; they must be byte-for-byte equal. As a result, Google Search will not trust that the response is representative of the request URL.





Impact to your site:





If the page has a corresponding non-AMP page, Google Search will index that instead. Otherwise, the page might not appear in Google Search at all.





Next steps:





If you are using a signed exchange service provider, consult them for assistance. Possible workarounds include changing the page’s URL to avoid bugs in common URL parsers. For instance, try eliminating percent-encoded or reserved characters, or unusual query string encodings such as a ? with no parameters.





If you are using AMP Packager, this could happen for several reasons:





  • Verify that your front-end reverse-proxy is rewriting URLs correctly. Issues are especially likely on URLs with percent-encoded or reserved characters. For instance, nginx has issues with its rewrite directive and the pathless form of its proxy_pass directive. To test this, send some test requests to your front end, and compare these to the URLs that AMP Packager logs to its stdout.
  • Verify that you are running the latest release of AMP Packager.
  • If you have ruled out all of the above, there may be a bug in AMP Packager; please file a bug.




The header 'header_name' for the signed exchange HTTP response has an invalid value





The HTTP response had a content-type of application/signed-exchange, but the response headers were invalid in some other way. For instance, the content-type may be lacking a v=b3 parameter. As a result, the format is unknown to Google and hence the response body cannot be extracted.





Impact to your site:





If the page has a corresponding non-AMP page, Google Search will index that instead. Otherwise, the page might not appear in Google Search at all.





Next steps:





If you are using a signed exchange service provider, consult them for assistance.





If you are using AMP Packager, this could happen for several reasons:





  • Verify that your front-end reverse-proxy is not altering the content-type headers. For the erroring URL, determine the corresponding /priv/doc URL on your internal packager domain, and fetch it including response headers (for instance, with curl -i). If the headers differ between the internal packager response and the external frontend response, this may be the source of the error. If the difference is in a header other than content-type, please file a bug against this help doc to update the list of requirements.
  • Verify that you are running the latest release of AMP Packager.
  • If you have ruled out all of the above, there may be a bug in AMP Packager; please file a bug.




Prioritize And Fix Issues





  1. On the summary page, filter out the warnings and focus on the errors first. By default, issues are sorted by a combination of severity, validation state, and the number of affected pages; we recommend that you address them in this default order. Fix errors caused by a common cause first (such as a bad template), then fix errors that are unique to each page.
  2. See if any increase in the total error count is caused mostly by a single error: look for a corresponding spike in a single issue in the table.
  3. See the information below about debugging spikes and missing AMP pages.
  4. Click a row in the table to see the error details page:
  5. The details page includes a sample of affected URLs. The list is not always complete, because it is limited to 1,000 rows, and might not include very recently discovered instances of this error.
  6. If it is a syntax error, click Learn more to get official documentation about the proper syntax.
  7. Click the inspect icon to run a validity test against an affected page. This test will pinpoint all errors (not just the current issue) and provide a code explorer highlighting the errors and providing more information. It is possible that an error has been fixed in the live page but is still listed as an error because it has not yet been recrawled; if so, request validation after you have fixed all instances of this issue.
  8. Fix all instances of the issue on your site, test your fix, and ensure that your fixes are live on the web.
  9. Return to the issue details page and click the Validate Fix button to begin the validation process. This process is not immediate. See About validation to understand the validation process.
  10. Continue fixing errors.
  11. When all errors have been fixed, remove the filter for warnings, and consider fixing the warnings. Some warnings are about missing optional structured data markup, which can enable new search features for pages with relevant content.




Sharing the report





You can share issue details in the coverage or enhancement reports by clicking the Share button on the page. This link grants access only to the current issue details page, plus any validation history pages for this issue, to anyone with the link. It does not grant access to other pages for your resource, or enable the shared user to perform any actions on your property or account. You can revoke the link at any time by disabling sharing for this page.





Exporting report data





Many reports provide an export button to export the report data. Both chart and table data are exported. Values are shown as either ~ or - in the report (not available/not a number) will be zeros in the downloaded data.





Error spikes





Determine if a spike caused by a group of pages moving from one severity to another:





  1. If you see a spike, look for a corresponding drop in another state (error or valid).
  2. If you find a corresponding drop, confirm that they are the same URLs.
  3. If the URLs moved from one state to another, determine what you changed to cause this.




The most common reason for a spike in errors is adding an error to a template used by many pages on your site.





Troubleshooting Missing AMP Pages





If the count of AMP pages (valid + warning + error) in the report is less than the count of AMP pages on your site, here are some possible reasons:





  • Confirm that your canonical non-AMP page is correctly linking to your AMP page.
  • Confirm that your AMP or canonical pages are not roboted or noindexed, or protected by auth or login requirements.
  • Check for the presence of your AMP and canonical pages in the index by searching Google for the URL of the canonical page. If it is not listed, it's not indexed.
  • If the canonical is there, confirm that it correctly links to your AMP page.
  • If the canonical is not there, submit it for indexing.
  • Is your AMP/canonical linked to by other pages? Are they listed in a sitemap? Use the URL Inspection tool on the canonical to request indexing for a small number of AMP pages, but for large numbers of pages, use sitemaps. (You only need to list the canonical in the sitemap.) Consider using the Sitemaps report to submit a sitemap.
  • It can take a few days for Google to find and crawl the missing pages, depending on how you notify Google about the new pages.
  • Some valid AMP pages might not be included in this report, although they might be listed in the Index Coverage report. This is because the Index Coverage report must be more comprehensive in order to help you debug indexing issues on your report, while the AMP Status report potentially covers fewer, but more relevant pages, but in greater detail, in order to help you debug specific AMP issues on your site. To confirm whether an AMP page is indexed, use the URL Inspection tool, which will have the definitive answer.




Understanding AMP Warnings





AMP pages with warnings are indexed and can be shown in Google Search results, but might not be shown with all possible AMP features (such as being shown in a Top Stories carousel). In other words, these pages might only be shown as plain blue link search results.





About AMP Validation





After you fix all instances of a specific issue on your site, you can ask Google to validate your changes. If all known instances are gone, the issue is marked as fixed in the status table and dropped to the bottom of the table. Search Console tracks the validation state of the issue as a whole, as well as the state of each instance of the issue. When all instances of the issue are gone, the issue is considered fixed. (For actual states recorded, see Issue validation state and Instance validation state.)





More about issue lifetime...





Basic validation flow





Here is an overview of the validation process after you click Validate Fix for an issue. This process can take several days, and you will receive progress notifications by email.





  1. When you click Validate Fix, Search Console immediately checks a few pages.
  2. If the current instance exists in any of these pages, validation ends, and the validation state remains unchanged.
  3. If the sample pages do not have the current error, validation continues with the state Started. If validation finds other unrelated issues, these issues are counted against that other issue type and validation continues.
  4. Search Console works through the list of known URLs affected by this issue. Only URLs with known instances of this issue are queued for recrawling, not the whole site. Search Console keeps a record of all URLs checked in the validation history, which can be reached from the issue details page.
  5. When a URL is checked:
  6. If the issue is not found, the instance validation state changes to Passing. If this is the first instance checked after validation has started, the issue validation state changes to Looking good.
  7. If the URL is no longer reachable, the instance validation state changes to Other (which is not an error state).
  8. If the instance is still present, the issue state changes to Failed, and validation ends. If this is a new page discovered by normal crawling, it is considered another instance of this existing issue.
  9. When all error and warning URLs have been checked and the issue count is 0, the issue state changes to Passed. Important: Even when the number of affected pages drops to 0 and the issue state changes to Passed, the original severity label will still be shown (Error or Warning).




Even if you never click "start validation" Google can detect fixed instances of an issue. If Google detects that all instances of an issue have been fixed during its regular crawl, it will change the issue state to "N/A" on the report.





When is an issue considered "fixed" for a URL or item?





An issue is marked as fixed for a URL or item when either of the following conditions are met:





  • When the URL is crawled and the issue is no longer found on the page. For an AMP tag error, this can mean that you either fixed the tag or that the tag has been removed (if the tag is not required). During a validation attempt, it will be considered as "passed."
  • If the page is not available to Google for any reason (page removed, marked noindex, requires authentication, and so on), the issue will be considered as fixed for that URL. During a validation attempt, it is counted in the "other" validation state.




Revalidation





When you click Revalidate for a failed validation, validation restarts for all failed instances, plus any new instances of this issue discovered through normal crawling.





You should wait for a validation cycle to complete before requesting another cycle, even if you have fixed some issues during the current cycle.





Instances that have passed validation (marked Passed) or are no longer reachable (marked Other) are not checked again, and are removed from the history when you click Revalidate.





Validation history





You can see the progress of a validation request by clicking the validation details link in the issue details page.





Entries in the validation history page are grouped by URL for the AMP report and Index Status report. In the Mobile Usability and Rich Result reports, items are grouped by the combination of URL + structured data item (as determined by the item's Name value). The validation state applies to the specific issue that you are examining. You can have one issue labeled "Passed" on a page, but other issues labeled "Failed", "Pending," or "Other".





Issue validation state





The following validation states apply to a given issue:





  • Not started: There are one or more pages with an instance of this issue that you have never begun a validation attempt for. Next steps:
  • Click into the issue to learn the details of the error. Inspect the individual pages to see examples of the error on the live page using the AMP Test. (If the AMP Test does not show the error on the page, it is because you fixed the error on the live page after Google found the error and generated this issue report.)
  • Click "Learn more" on the details page to see the details of the rule that was violated.
  • Click an example URL row in the table to get details on that specific error.
  • Fix your pages and then click Validate fix to have Google recrawl your pages. Google will notify you about the progress of the validation. Validation takes anywhere from a few days up to about two weeks, so please be patient. 
  • Started:  You have begun a validation attempt and no remaining instances of the issue have been found yet. Next step: Google will send notifications as validation proceeds, telling you what to do, if necessary.
  • Looking good: You started a validation attempt, and all issue instances that have been checked so far have been fixed. Next step: Nothing to do, but Google will send notifications as validation proceeds, telling you what to do.
  • Passed: All known instances of the issue are gone (or the affected URL is no longer available). You must have clicked "Validate fix" to get to this state (if instances disappeared without you requesting validation, state would change to N/A). Next step: Nothing more to do.
  • N/A: Google found that the issue was fixed on all URLs, even though you never started a validation attempt. Next step: Nothing more to do.
  • Failed: A certain threshold of pages still contain this issue, after you clicked "Validate." Next steps: Fix the issue and revalidate.




Instance validation state





After validation has been requested, every instance of the issue is assigned one of the following validation states:





  • Pending validation: Queued for validation. The last time Google looked, this issue instance existed.
  • Passed: [Not available in all reports] Google checked for the issue instance and it no longer exists. Can reach this state only if you explicitly clicked Validate for this issue instance.
  • Failed: Google checked for the issue instance and it's still there. Can reach this state only if you explicitly clicked Validate for this issue instance.
  • Other: [Not available in all reports] Google couldn't reach the URL hosting the instance, or (for structured data) couldn't find the item on the page any more. Considered equivalent to Passed.




Note that the same URL can have different states for different issues; For example, if a single page has both issue X and issue Y, issue X can be in a validation state Passed and issue Y on the same page can be in a validation state Pending.





AMP Known Issues





The following are known issues in Search Console. No need to report them to us, but we'd love your feedback on any other features or issues you spot. Use the Feedback mechanism built into the navigation bar.





  • Some issues have long names that are not easy to understand.
  • There can be a lag between when an issue is added to the graph and when it is added to the table.
  • If your site has a very large number of issues (whether or not there are active instances), the report will show only the first 200 issues, sorted by importance.

Post a Comment

2 Comments

  1. Hi nice post, Useful but readers getting little confusion, I reading your every posts on this blog its very useful and informative. I drop my Blog link link here for all bloggers. I hope you will like my Blogging tutorial. Please support me I'm a beginner tech blogger. I don't have enough English writing skills so I can't get global audience like you. Support me to get some traffic.. I'm getting 200 to 950 hits of my total blog posts per day. Blogging tutorial for Blogger

    ReplyDelete
  2. Categorie III, type 5/6

    Bescherming tegen chemische gevaren en bij het hanteren van gevaarlijke stoffen tijdens industrieel onderhoud, tijdens het reinigen van containers en tanks in noodsituaties en chemicaliƫn in de landbouw.

    Type 5- NF EN 13982
    FacebookACCOUNTShttps://www.facebook.com/Blauwe-Overalls-106875348564929
    Bescherming tegen vaste chemicaliƫn, zwevende deeltjes. Volledig waterdichte uitrusting. Bijvoorbeeld asbestverwijdering, agrarische omgevingen tijdens poederbewerkingen. Wegwerp Overall Type 5/6 Blauwe

    ReplyDelete